The Record So Far
January 16, 2010
I received a note from a listener complaining about Obama's
leadership and stating that the president has simply "wasted 365 days." Many on
the liberal left agree. Major
initiatives proposed in his campaign have not been realized. The senate has
proved obdurate. The public option is essentially off the table. The banks are
getting away with billions. Had Obama waited longer and spent more time in the
senate, said my correspondent, he would have had more dogs to call home when he
became president.
All that is true and all of it is depressing.
But when we get discouraged we might remember this: This president is not
fraudulent, explaining war for oil as if it were war for democracy. This vice
president is not promoting the idea of the commander in chief above the law. This
chairman of the Federal Reserve is not any longer lauding the free market as if
were the writ of God. This president is not strutting around aircraft carriers
earning the ridicule of nations.
And seriously, on the positive side, has he really "wasted 365 days?"
He has vigorously engaged the US in the climate change negotiations, urging
action at Copenhagen instead of opposing it, forcing Brazil, China and India to
come to the table as well.
His EPA has faced up to the science and declared carbon
dioxide emissions a threat to public health. For the first time the United
States will seriously regulate one of the major causes of global warming.
He has set a timetable for beginning withdrawal from
Afghanistan. He did it in such a way that it numbed the hawks into silence and
yet there it lies: a challenge to the military and the CIA to produce or get
out.
He has brought to the brink of passage a health care bill
that will extend coverage to 30 million and that by itself would have been the
major accomplishment of any administration, not just George W. Bush, or Bill
Clinton, but also of LBJ or FDR. That bill will also do away with the
cost-saving provision of "pre-existing conditions" and force insurers
to find some other way to save other than by denying coverage. If the new bill closes the prescription
drug doughnut hole, that too, will be a major achievement. Not one of his
predecessors has been able to do the same.
He has placed a feisty, no-nonsense woman justice on the
Supreme Court. Sotomayor is not Earl Warren, but she is not Roberts or Alito,
either, and she has her feet firmly in the real world and not the ideological
world that declares self interest to be moral bedrock.
He has imposed new rules for lobbying by people who leave government
and signaled a willingness to put public campaign financing on the table.
He has made manufacturing for energy conservation a major
national priority and pushed that development as a way to stimulate American exports.
He got the stimulus package passed and put an estimated
2 million people back to work and there are more jobs in the pipeline.
He is pushing to close Guantanamo and it is definitely not
his fault that no provincial governor will allow the prisoners in.
His attorney general has begun to restore integrity to the
Department of Justice. There is, I believe, more to do. But we are not getting
craven rationalizations for violating international law and ignoring domestic
statutes. We are not claiming that
the king or the president is above the law and turning back the clock on 700
years of legal history. We have
been spared the embarrassment of Alberto Gonzales and Harriet Meirs.
None of this would have happened under John McCain and Sarah Palin. Not any of
it. In my book, turning the ship of state, even to this degree is not
"wasting time."
It is fair to argue that Obama might have done more to realize the high
expectations that he himself created; that his manner is too cool; that he is
too soft on Republicans and does not get tough when he needs to. That is all
possibly true. But who is the model for getting tough? Rush Limbaugh? Dick
Cheney? We have only just finished eight years of governance by slogans and
fears and the substitution of greed and self interest for the common good, all
of which led to economic and political collapse.
I prefer what we have.
